Shocking narrative on the future of mankind's follies or stagnant regurgitation of the dreadful Ayn Rand's laughable morality garbage? The latter.

 

They trick you into thinking you can make choices here and there but you eventually realize you're on a Point A to Point B journey throughout.

 

You can either take way too long reprogramming a turret to attack your enemies or just cap them in the head. You also have the ability to get health pick-ups from a vending machine by hacking it, but the game is so easy, you don't really need them. Which reminds me...

 

Got gunned down by a crazy ass? Oh well, just regenerate 5 feet away with full health and no penalties.

 

Ever played Condemned? Remember Hexen? Now that I'm at it, ever played any FPS? It'sallcrammedtogetherinonegame. YAAAWWWNN.

 

Staple your socks to your feet; they're about to be BLOWN OFF!! You just find tapes lying around that spit pieces of the already laughable story at you.

 

The only thing they right is the title-- I was SHOCKed to see just how many Game of the Year awards this vomit-pile raked in. Who's blowing who?

 

It's also been imagined that it questions morals. Are you serious? If choosing to kill the Little Sisters questions your morality, than what of the decisions you don't even have to think about in the Grand Theft Auto series? You need a ride, take it. Kill 5 or 50 pedestrians, done. It isn't the place of video games to rate our value of life. You're not making life or death choices, you're just colliding these rendered polygons with some other rendered polygons. Games are entertainment, and Bioshock fails to create anything I haven't already hated in the past.